Evolution: a different view (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Saturday, May 23, 2015, 11:30 (3472 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: We have a very subtle and complex form of speech for which all those changes were prearranged. Definitely pre-planning for what came after the earliest attempts at speech that used the voice mechanisms as they developed.
> 
>DHW: Please reread your post of 2 May, as above. Your point both there and in your first book was that the changes were NOT used, and that was your evidence of pre-planning. You now agree that they WERE used, and so you have lost your “evidence” that they were pre-planned and prearranged. Of course you are free to reiterate your belief as emphatically as you possibly can (“definitely pre-planning”), but such emphasis does not hide the fact that by your own admission you have lost “the key issue”.-I think you are over-reaching here just slightly. Just because something was used when it was implemented does not negate pre-planning, nor does it remove the evidence for preplanning. Humans were planned and designed to be able to communication, and all the necessary morphological differences that were needed for that to happen were planned into our design.

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.