Language and Logic (General)

by GateKeeper , Tuesday, April 15, 2014, 01:02 (3874 days ago) @ David Turell

I see no evidence that can single out any one conclusion (truth). It is like talking about ware life came from. We can say it started on earth. We can say it started when an impact happened. both are valid.-So we entertain ourselves with the supporting data for each and laugh, with each other, at how cool it is. People that can understand this (first two/three rows of the P.T.) find it fascinating that life was inevitable at the moment of the big bang. And may even be a requirement for this universe.-These truths that seem self evident are elegant in nature. But not easy. By no means easy at all. Describe humanity? what is a "human"? Martin Luther King? Charles Manson? Both? Neither?. -Rom refuses answer a question that predicts if the universe is more likely alive, or more likely not alive. I am not smart enough to seek the truth with that kind of stance. I am grateful David for your honesty. It seems to me that you mean no malice when you state something. And are seeking some answers that are tricky to communicate in the forum format. Good bye. Till we meet again that is.