ABEL\'S UNIVERSE (General)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Sunday, November 20, 2011, 00:38 (4753 days ago) @ Abel

Abel

Here are a few of the times that I tried to make it clear that archangels are created beings that are the property of heaven. That is, they are not citizens of the worlds that they serve, nor shall they ever be.

1.

Abel: "The Watchers had been corrupted by pride. Pride that was, in part, created when they began to believe the line of crap they were feeding primitive people so they would follow them. They began to believe that they were gods when they are slaves."

2

"There are two Metatrons. The primal Metatron is the first of the 10 sentinels made."

3

"The last sentinel made to walk this world (a.k.a. the seventh sentinel) is the feminine aspect of the Primal Metatron."

"There are many who claim to be archangels, because they foolishly believe they want to be an archangel. What fool would claim that they will never be a citizen of heaven. That they shall never be as great as the least of you that leaves this place. All archangels envy humans because they have souls and a very few hate you for it.

4

The Seven are not supposed to know in life that they are archangels. There is less to be gained from the knowledge then what is lost, and that is hope."[/color]

Ok, so a little math and grammar lesson at the same time. The number of quotes here in which the phrase archangel is used 2:4=50%

The number of times the word slave 1:4=25%

The number of times the word Archangel and Slave appear in the same quote 0:4 = 0.0%

I.E. Until the post where you directly answered DHW, you never said, Archangels are slaves. You said the Watchers were slaves. Now, repeatedly, Bella and I have asked that you please refrain from adding/changing words and stories. This is a prime example of why. If you had used the phrase Watchers consistantly, or Archangels consistantly, or Metatrons consistantly, we might have been able to follow your story. But when you use all of these phrases interchangably it becomes impossible to follow you.

WE DO NOT USE THE SAME VOCABULARY TO EXPRESS THE SAME IDEAS THAT YOU DO. PICK A WORD AND STICK TO IT, BETTER YET, DEFINE IT, THEN STICK TO IT.

Hopefully that statement now stands out enough that you will finally pay attention to it. How can you reasonably expect anyone to follow you. Abel, I say this with the utmost sincerity: I do not have the time, nor the patience, to continuously cross-reference the things you post. You need to get your work in to a single, coherent format, with a standardized vocabulary, with a standardized chronology, and a comprehensive list of major players, and get it organized before you present it. When you first posted on here you expressed some complaints about how your views have been received elsewhere, and aside from how hard the are to swallow in the first place, I would say that this is probably the single dominant reason.

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.