Ain\'t nature wonderful (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 12:26 (5163 days ago) @ dhw

Thank you for all these fascinating examples. I think it's important that you stress the incompleteness of Darwin's theory rather than dismissing it outright as the Creationists do.-I would consider myself a creationist, agnostic in respect to the nature of the UI that created it, but a creationist none-the-less. However, even I do not dismiss Darwinism outright. That animals adapt, I have no doubt. That over time, their can be minute physiological changes that gradually amount to big changes, I have no doubt. That all life started off on the planet from a chemical soup, evolved into a enormously more complex form (DNA/RNA), then into and even more complex form, single-celled organisms, then on to ever increasing complex forms complete with full bone structures, brains, eyes, ears, etc... I highly doubt that. That it all could happen within the time constraints proposed, I highly doubt.-And worst of all is to present evolution as the ONLY method for the origins of life and as FACT, even though there are still holes in the THEORY, is probably one of the more deplorable acts of modern science.