Ain\'t nature wonderful (Introduction)

by David Turell , Saturday, August 28, 2010, 02:37 (5181 days ago) @ xeno6696


> > > David--as I've mentioned before I don't see AT ALL how what I'm saying here isn't accepted paradigm! How is epigenetics any different from natural selection, when as I observed previously--the filter that IS natural selection is the ultimate arbiter of what gets to stay??? And I fail to see how a designer explains this any better! Help me out here!
> > 
> 
> How does my thinking above differ from accepted paradigm?
> 
> > If Archaia have these adaptive processes from the beginning, then these rapid adaptation mechanisms drive evolution forward to the more and more complex forms. We weren't there 3.6 mya when life happened, (that's another design issue we haven't settled), but presuming Archaia haven't changed much, epigenetics was there from the beginning. And I believe by design. Life appeared spontaneously by accident and knew from the beginning it needed rapid adaptation? Not likely.-I don't know how I can give a better answer. In the first living cell there was a small amount of RNA/DNA to run the function of the cell. Adaptation had to develop later as a response to threats, danger, huge environmental changes. I am not sure life could have survived without adaptability. I know this is unknown to us at the present time. I know the only way we can presume this, is to conclude that the current ancient organisms we study are unchanged, and had adaptability from their beginnings. Otherwise it is my unproven theory, and always will be. Obviously, my theory requires adesigner.