Ain\'t nature wonderful (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Monday, September 13, 2010, 20:11 (5164 days ago) @ David Turell

Is it ironic that the more I read in web forums regarding science, and the more I engage in scientific debates, the more spiritually minded I become? -There are more holes in Darwin's theory, more assumptions, more guesses, and more presuppositions than in any Religion. The same could be said for modern Cosmology. The time lines for evolution do not fit. The time spans are too short, by far, to accomplish the tasks assigned to natural selection. In this instance, an insect, and a plant, develop and adapt to each other enough to make physiological changes in the insects wing structure, prior to either species going extinct. Secondly, if the insect AND the plant were evolving at the same time, why did the plant's leaf structure not evolve into something more efficient, thus making the changes to the insects wings useless. Third, where are the insects with the original wing structure, and the failed attempts in between the original wing structure and the new upgraded model. Fourth, having read only the abstract, I did not see any evidence stating the plant this insect was supposed to be modeling grew in the region where they found the insect fossil, only that they came from the same time period.-
Oh... yeah.. that's right.. in the Darwinian model the evidence conveniently gets eaten or otherwise destroyed, or never leaves a fossil record. How convenient...And they say Deism offers God of Gaps arguments..