Ain\'t nature wonderful (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Monday, August 23, 2010, 01:24 (5206 days ago) @ David Turell


> > David--as I've mentioned before I don't see AT ALL how what I'm saying here isn't accepted paradigm! How is epigenetics any different from natural selection, when as I observed previously--the filter that IS natural selection is the ultimate arbiter of what gets to stay??? And I fail to see how a designer explains this any better! Help me out here!
> 
> 
> My theory that is being born out as the research continues to reveal is that the rapid changes of adaptation appear to start in very early organisms, the Archaia. Not waiting for a chance mutation to help, -Right here; to me mutation hasn't ever meant just a random cosmic ray that came down... mutation also represents genetic recombination. -the genome forges forward and then you are correct, the best organism wins under natural selection. Natural selection culls out passively, because it can only cull whatever is presented to it. Yes, it is an active process when it is at work.
> -How does my thinking above differ from accepted paradigm?-> If Archaia have these adaptive processes from the beginning, then these rapid adaptation mechanisms drive evolution forward to the more and more complex forms. We weren't there 3.6 mya when life happened, (that's another design issue we haven't settled), but presuming Archaia haven't changed much, epigenetics was there from the beginning. And I believe by design. Life appeared spontaneously by accident and knew from the beginning it needed rapid adaptation? Not likely.-Unknowable.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"