God and Evolution of the universe (Introduction)

by dhw, Friday, September 20, 2019, 08:47 (676 days ago) @ David Turell

Dhw: […] If we think of the universe as an eternally and infinitely changing mass of materials, it is not that difficult to conceive of the “coincidence” eventually happening.

DAVID: First, according to Big Bang theory the universe is not eternal.

dhw: But according to you, your God is, and even if the BB theory is true, we have no idea what preceded the BB, so the theory of an eternally and infinitely changing mass of materials is no more and no less feasible or provable than your theory of an eternal God.

DAVID: My logical point is something or someone has to be eternal for were to be anything now.

Precisely, so what is the point in your saying that according to the BB theory the universe is not eternal? My logical point is that either there is an eternal God (your someone) or there is an eternal mass of materials (something).

DAVID: Second, we find the Earth is most unusual among planets, and we know it supports life. Further [..] you are still touting the idea of why did God bother to do so much a forehand, still asking for direct creation, not supported by history.

dhw: What is not supported by history is your theory that your always-in-control God’s one and only purpose was to create H. sapiens! […] Now you tell us that his way of specially designing the planet that would support life to fulfil his one and only purpose was to specially design billions of heavenly bodies extant and extinct, including the “cold and molecular shells”, that have no known relevance whatsoever to the support of life.

DAVID: Those cold shells are the same as the way stars explode and fill the universe with the element molecules necessary for life.

So apparently your God designed all the billions of heavenly bodies extant and extinct because every one of them was and is necessary to create and support life on Planet Earth. I don’t buy it.

dhw: Your claim that he “preferred” to do it that way does not provide even a smidgen of explanation. So maybe he had a different purpose, or maybe he isn’t always in control, or chooses not to be always in control. […]

DAVID: I view your theism as constantly colored with a humanistic God. As the creator what we see in our reality is what He did. He had to prefer it. Your theistic hat is quite askew.

You have no idea why your God would have chosen to create billions of non-Earths and billions of non-human life forms, lifestyles and natural wonders when all he wanted to design was Planet Earth and H. sapiens. But you defend this totally illogical theory by telling us that any logical explanation of our reality can’t be right, because God is not human!

Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum