Evolution (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 13:07 (5392 days ago) @ dhw

However, the summary was clearly a misguided effort, since it has had precisely the opposite effect to what I'd intended. Instead of bringing order to chaos, I have added to the chaos. The "evolution" thread has turned into a Hydra, and it's painfully obvious that the 'h' in dhw does not stand for Hercules! - hah! Wyrmy jokes! - Well, at least in my case, there's no need to draw that line--I was made painfully aware of that by the gentleman I met last year who adheres to process philosophy. - To be frank, off the top of my head I do not know what started this, but I can promise if its far off course its probably my fault. My brain quite easily jumps from topic to topic. - I think the main point was to draw attention to the major unresolved question within biology. I think it can boil down thus: - 1. Traditional Darwinian evolution, micro changes over time that give rise to novel organisms over geologic time. - 2. "Huxley-an" evolution, who stated that there was no reason to believe that evolution couldn't happen relatively rapidly. (Punctuated Equilibrium would belong here.) - The key here is that we know that speciation *can* happen in short geologic time, and it may not be simply a function for how many generations a species can produce in that time frame. - Though how these questions work to resolve our greater issue, I am presently at a loss.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"