Quantum weirdness; no Big Bang (Introduction)

by David Turell , Thursday, February 12, 2015, 21:18 (3572 days ago) @ dhw


> DAVID: Please look at my entry yesterday about the imbalance of mesons (2/11, 14:08) Energy made matter under strict meson guidance. I don't believe energy and matter interacted independently of all the 200 factors in fine tuning. Your idea implies chance blundering forward.
> 
> dhw: I did read it, and noted that they still don't know why there is a “preponderance of matter in the universe today”. I also noted their talk of “incontrovertible evidence” for the Big Bang, which clearly runs against the theory we are dealing with here. As I keep saying, the concept of an eternal, ever-changing universe, or an eternity of universes, gives chance an infinite number of opportunities to “blunder” into one form of life or another. No, I don't believe it, but as with your God hypothesis, I don't disbelieve it either.-The pi-mason imbalance theory has been around and generally accepted for many years. I saw the comment you mention about "they still don't know why" and ignored it, as not being on the same page with most material published. I have a good sense of majority opinion, not that it is infallible, but currently accepted. You just see bits and pieces I put here, and you clamp on what really is just one aspect of current views. The same with sentient cells.