Origin of Life: early atmosphere (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Thursday, January 15, 2015, 16:14 (3601 days ago) @ David Turell

Not much oxygen:
> 
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/01/150114115247.htm
> 
> "In the new study, a team led by researchers from McGill's Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, used mass spectrometry to measure the amounts of different isotopes of sulfur in rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq belt. The results enabled the scientists to determine that the sulfur in these rocks, which are at least 3.8 billion years old and possibly 500 million years older, had been cycled through Earth's early atmosphere, showing the air at the time was extremely oxygen-poor compared to today, and may have had more methane and carbon dioxide.
> 
> "We found that the isotopic fingerprint of this atmospheric cycling looks just like similar fingerprints from rocks that are a billion to 2 billion years younger," said Emilie Thomassot, a former postdoctoral researcher at McGill and lead author of the paper. Emilie Thomassot is now with the Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques (CRPG) in Nancy France.
> 
> "Those younger rocks contain clear signs of microbial life and there are a couple of possible interpretations of our results," says Boswell Wing, an associate professor at McGill and co-author of the new study. "One interpretation is that biology controlled the composition of the atmosphere on early Earth, with similar microbial biospheres producing the same atmospheric gases from Earth's infancy to adolescence. We can't rule out, however, the possibility that the biosphere was decoupled from the atmosphere. In this case geology could have been the major player in setting the composition of ancient air, with massive volcanic eruptions producing gases that recurrently swamped out weak biological gas production."
> -A third interpretation is that the atmosphere trapped in the two rocks is the same atmosphere because it was captured at the same time, and that there dating methods are wrong.

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.