Origin of Life: Organic chemists don't know how (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Saturday, October 18, 2014, 01:52 (3691 days ago) @ David Turell

David: If God created everything in life, why give the process of creation the appearance of evolution?
> > 
> > Tony:I am not so sure that he did. That is an assumption that we have made without ever observing it occurring. The better question is why do we assume that evolution happened without ever having directly observed it? The same evidence used for evolution also distinctly support design by a common designer
> 
> David: The appearance of simple to complex, from very old single-celled to humans, all layered in rock with five or six aging isotope methods all agreeing within 10-20 % is strongly suggestive of some form of evolution, but not Darwin's.-The fact that your car has rubber wheels and tubing, pre-fabricated frames and metal components, and runs on petroleum which is formed from a completely separate process and added later to make it work does not eliminate the need for each stage of the process to be separately designed and implemented. Only an ignorant fool would suggest that cars are made from whole cloth as is without any prep work needing to be done to the build up the components that go into making it. You are not foolish, and life is a million times more complicated than a car. -This idea that it either has to be evolution or *POOF* instantaneous perfection and simultaneous creation of everything is part of the problem with these discussions.

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.