horizontal gene transfer: the real IM? (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Sunday, December 21, 2014, 07:42 (3625 days ago) @ David Turell


> > 
> > Tony: Hrmm, but the concept of God, at least from my perspective, is falsifiable. Both by science, Archaeology, and Philosophy. I am not going to hijack this thread derailing into that statement, but yes, there is a means to falsify god, and ironically, God provides the means to falsify him.
> 
>David: Please give us your approach. This is an instructional and learning website.-The Bible's claim is that it is 100% true. That gives three sets of predictions:-The statements regarding science will be 100% accurate. 
The Statements regarding history will be 100% accurate. -Neither one of those, in of itself prove anything divine, but they do build a record of reliability.-The on the proves divine influence is prophecy. Since prophecy, particularly specific prophecies over large time scales have no rational explanation, a 100% accuracy rating is the test of falsifiability.-The only scientific statement that I know for certain has yet to be proven is the Flood account. There is a lot of archaeological evidence, but there is a lot of argument over the flood, which, ironically, fulfills a prophecy. :P

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.