Evolution in schools; legal trap (Introduction)

by David Turell , Monday, June 04, 2012, 15:29 (4533 days ago) @ dhw

ROMANSH: The problem David [is] that Intelligent Design is really creationism. And whatever these two concepts are they are not science...
> 
> DAVID: I look at some of their reasoning and it fits what I see as I study evolution.
> 
> As I see it, these two statements cover two major areas of misunderstanding. Firstly, science is supposed to be neutral. The moment a scientist uses science to support a belief of any kind, whether theistic or atheistic, he leaves the realm of science behind. -An example of ID work, this time philosophy. Abiogenesis cannot spontaneously happen:-http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/on-the-impossibility-of-abiogenesis/-Try and pick apart the reasoning.