Core Accretion Gaining Steam... (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, December 06, 2011, 00:14 (4735 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

No, it proves that there are earth sized planets in the so-called 'Goldilocks' zones. It does not prove that there are "Earth-like" planets at all. For the planet to be considered "Earth-like" it would need comparable chemical and resource composition of both land and air, along with water and an atmosphere. In addition, it would also need to have similar density, spin, EM fields, etc etc etc. As I said, the list could go on for a year. We must get out of this reductionist mindset. You can not take a complex system and compare it to another complex system based on one or two similar variables.

Remember Tony, I wasn't quoting from the formal paper at Nasa, I was quoting from a source that probably followed this course:

1. Nasa publication
2. Nasa press release
3. AP writer reports
4. Source of my story.

Journalists care about what sells, not about truth, which in America is called yellow journalism.

It is this kind of journalism that keeps me from watching news.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"