Complexity of gene codes (Introduction)

by David Turell , Sunday, January 09, 2011, 17:23 (5066 days ago) @ David Turell


> I cannot conceive of a God who keeps fiddling with his creation. It is either designed from the beginning or we will agree George is correct and it all evolved with those interesting paroxysms of puctuated equilibium thrown in to confuse us. IT IS TOO COMPLEX for evolution to do it by chance.
> 
> I don't have the whole article, but more evidence of complexer and complexer than we ever imagined, since Watson/Crick announced their (as it is turning out) simplistic code.
> 
> http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v11/n9/execsumm/nrg2843.html-This article is a great story of RNA research and how RNA is the protein maker, taking instructions from DNA, and then acting very much on its own. Way too complex a system to have designed itself, and as I predicted in my book, getting complexer and complexer as research digs into the system of the genome.-http://www.the-scientist.com/2010/9/1/34/1/-
"The fact is that the scientific evidence that we have is full of holes, or mysteries. At one time people believed in the God of the Gaps and then retreated from that position because the gaps seemed to be getting smaller and smaller and threatened to close up altogether. But that is not the case today: the gaps are getting bigger and bigger; the chances of the world that we live in happening by accident are vanishingly small. The chances of a strand of DNA assembling itself by accident are infinitesimal, too small to be worth considering. The world is an essentially mysterious place. Science has not got it all sorted out, whatever Stephen Hawking says: science has only deepened the mysteries. In the face of the mysteries of life there are only two responses, a shrug of the shoulders, or faith in God."-From:-Martin Down is the author of Deluded by Darwinism, pubished by David C. Cook 2007