similarities between New Age atheists and religious nut jobs (Introduction)

by satyansh , Saturday, December 11, 2010, 10:52 (5074 days ago) @ George Jelliss

India 1947 Hinduism accounted for 86.5% of the population of India. Islam (9.9%), Christianity (1.6%) and Sikhism (1.3%) and the rest were other faiths.
India 2001 According to the 2001 census,Hinduism accounted for 80.5% of the population of India. Islam (13.4%), Christianity (2.3%) and Sikhism (1.9%) and the rest were other faiths.
Pakistan The Hindu population in Pakistan has reduced from 26%, in 1947, right down to 2% in 1990 which is now less than 1%.
Bangladesh The Hindu Population in 1971 when they were formed was 35% and now it is a mere 10%. Conceivably, by 2050 Bangladesh will achieve the status of Pakistan: no significant Hindu population.-If hindus were so violent and that violence stems out of their religious faiths than explain why are they reducing in numbers in their country and neighboring countries. you have been brain washed by the same psuedo secular people that have brain washed lots of people in India too. You are not the first one who has spoken to me about this and you wont be the last one. But if someone who really wants to have a good debate can set up a time and date with me on the e-mail. -Now to the second link. Do you know the history of ayodhya. there are archeological facts of there being a mandir underneath and a mosque. again i condemn the breaking of the mosque because now i believe muslims are a part of india and they shud be allowed to live here as much as hindus are. but i do not condemn the thought of making a temple at the same sight. by the way high court of india has already given a ruling to the case of ayodhya stating very clearly that the site should be distributed equally amongst all the parties to satisfy all faiths.Two out of the 3 judges were Hindus. Now onto the riots in Gujrat. Well my dear friend every action has a equal and opposite reaction. Do you even know why the riots in Gujrat happened. There was train that was coming to Godhra a place in Gujrat which had young hindu kids and women and saints. Now the muslim mob burnt down that train which than angered the hindu locals and again in self defense they attacked the muslims. now if the muslims wudnt have attacked the hindus wudnt have reacted. my dear friend it is very easy to criticise but without knowing the ground realities of life you should not go about commenting like this. Like I said again i am happyily inviting you and your friends in a debate on these subjects in detail. I will show you facts and evidences. U can already realise how sure i must be because i am the one who is iviting you not the other way around. 
 In the mean time please refrain from blaming eastern philosophies for violence stemming out of religious identities. I once again repeat myself. I know there are citings of violence in the OT and the Koran but i still say removing those religions will not make mankind peaceful. Mankind is more than capable of fighting for new means. Heck Adolf Hitler used Darwins theory of Natural selection and started killing handicapped and mentally challenged people and justified it by saying if we remove these people the upcoming race will be even better. So should i infer that Darwinism is a violent thought. Please think before you criticize people.