Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math (The limitations of science)
> I wonder whether it might be a fair test to ask whether something would continue to exist in the absence of human beings. I suspect that the laws of physics would manage to carry on pretty well without us. How about maths?-The math formulas in nature are truly amazing. The following is a discussion of fraactal formulas in nature. They are there with or without us. Studies of dentrology show that fractals describe branching patters as shown in the following essay from the dreaded ID website:-http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/formulas-and-forms/#more-12123
Complete thread:
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-10, 21:41
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-13, 21:28
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-13, 23:00
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-14, 12:51
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-14, 16:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-14, 23:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-15, 03:19
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-15, 19:34
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-15, 21:33
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-16, 18:12
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-16, 21:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-16, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 02:52
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 14:30
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-17, 17:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 18:42
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-17, 21:44
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:12
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
David Turell,
2010-02-18, 06:01
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-18, 11:53
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:29
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 13:58
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-18, 11:53
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-17, 21:44
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 18:42
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-17, 17:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 14:30
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 03:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 04:00
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 02:52
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-16, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-16, 21:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-16, 18:12
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-15, 21:33
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-15, 19:34
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-15, 03:19
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-14, 23:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-14, 16:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-14, 12:51
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-25, 23:05
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-02, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
David Turell,
2010-03-02, 23:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-03, 16:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
David Turell,
2010-03-03, 23:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 03:55
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-04, 14:54
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-06, 15:17
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:20
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-06, 15:17
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
David Turell,
2010-03-03, 23:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-03, 16:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-03, 15:35
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-04, 14:45
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-04, 22:23
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-05, 21:40
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-06, 00:37
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-06, 22:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-07, 00:08
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-07, 22:43
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-08, 00:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-08, 20:01
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-10, 17:28
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-11, 01:17
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-12, 13:53
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-17, 00:27
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-17, 20:57
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-17, 00:27
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-10, 17:28
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-08, 20:01
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-08, 00:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-07, 22:43
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-07, 00:08
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-06, 22:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-06, 00:37
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-05, 21:40
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-03-04, 22:23
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-04, 14:45
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
David Turell,
2010-03-02, 23:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
dhw,
2010-03-02, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
xeno6696,
2010-02-13, 23:00
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-13, 21:28