Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Thursday, February 18, 2010, 11:53 (5391 days ago) @ David Turell


> > This is a good point. Some of these figures have archaeological evidence to support their existence--at least King Arthur and Jesus. Jesus is referred to in some Roman historical documents, 
> 
> The only roughly contemporaneous mention of Jesus is by Josephus, who was born about the time Jesus was crucified. The entry in Josephus' history is though by many to be a forgery. The first gospel was written about 40-60 years after Jesus' death.-While I actually remember that (from some far corner of my mind), how large of a consensus is there that Jesus was not a historical figure?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"