Back to irreducible complexity (Introduction)

by David Turell , Friday, February 19, 2010, 19:13 (5390 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by unknown, Friday, February 19, 2010, 20:12

Tandem repeats is the term used for 'junk' DNA's ability to push rapid genomic change. The more we learn about junk DNA the more complexity appears, and the pre-planning may have been previously inserted into the genome.-http://www.physorg.com/news162753069.html -Another example of the ability to have rapid change is in Darwin finches. This fits a mathematical formula. As Matt and I have pointed out, nature does math all the time: -http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/02/did-darwins-finches-do-math.html

Post reply

4234 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 14:43
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 17:17
  - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:28
    - Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:48
    - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 19:32
      - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-27, 14:59
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-28, 17:07
        Back to irreducible complexity - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:25
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:31
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 14:47
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:54
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-31, 17:25
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 02:51
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 04:46
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 13:00
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:46
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:33
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:13
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:37
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 02:43
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 16:42
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:42
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:57
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 00:37
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-10, 14:04
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 17:48
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-11, 11:02
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 20:49
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:35
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:19
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-08, 13:14
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:17
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:01
        
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-02, 14:52
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-05, 23:33
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 01:19
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 11:43
  - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-16, 14:52
    - Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:50
      - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 05:56
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 19:13

AgnosticWeb.com

Back to irreducible complexity (Introduction)