Back to irreducible complexity (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, February 17, 2010, 14:50 (5189 days ago) @ David Turell

David,-Maybe I'm just arguing via ignorance, but I remember exaptation being a Gould idea, not a Darwin idea? (and what difference would it make?) What's the textbook view of exaptation?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"

Post reply

3998 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 14:43
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 17:17
  - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:28
    - Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:48
    - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 19:32
      - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-27, 14:59
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-28, 17:07
        Back to irreducible complexity - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:25
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:31
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 14:47
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:54
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-31, 17:25
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 02:51
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 04:46
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 13:00
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:46
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:33
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:13
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:37
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 02:43
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 16:42
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:42
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:57
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 00:37
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-10, 14:04
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 17:48
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-11, 11:02
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 20:49
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:35
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:19
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-08, 13:14
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:17
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:01
        
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-02, 14:52
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-05, 23:33
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 01:19
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 11:43
  - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-16, 14:52
    - Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:50
      - Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 05:56
        Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 19:13

AgnosticWeb.com

Back to irreducible complexity (Introduction)