Back to irreducible complexity (Introduction)
by xeno6696 
, Sonoran Desert, Saturday, January 23, 2010, 17:17 (5214 days ago) @ David Turell
This article by a theistic philosopher of science gives a brief account of how the ribosome manufactures proteins, and presents the usual chicken and egg problem for evolution. Does anyone have an answer for his observation? > > http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2010/01/ribosome-checks-for-translation-errors.html&... > Mine is DNA was pre-coded to make the ribosome.-Interesting, he's really tackling an origins question and not one of evolution or natural selection. He's asking "how did ribosomes evolve property 'x,'" when clearly life as we can describe requires ribosomes to function. -That's why his argument spins its wheels here.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Complete thread:
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-23, 14:43
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Back to irreducible complexity -
xeno6696,
2010-01-23, 17:17
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-23, 19:28
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:48
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-26, 19:32
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-27, 14:59
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-28, 17:07
- Back to irreducible complexity -
dhw,
2010-01-29, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-01-29, 17:31
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-01-30, 14:47
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-01-31, 11:54
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-31, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-01-31, 11:54
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 02:51
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-02-08, 04:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 13:00
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-02-08, 16:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-02-09, 01:13
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:37
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-09, 02:43
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 16:42
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-02-09, 01:13
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-09, 11:42
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:57
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-10, 00:37
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-10, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-10, 17:48
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-11, 11:02
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-21, 20:49
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-23, 09:35
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:19
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-23, 09:35
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-21, 20:49
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-11, 11:02
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-10, 17:48
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-10, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-02-08, 16:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 13:00
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-02-08, 13:14
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 23:17
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:01
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
xeno6696,
2010-02-08, 23:17
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-02-08, 04:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
David Turell,
2010-01-30, 14:47
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) -
dhw,
2010-01-29, 17:31
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-02, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-05, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 01:19
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-05, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity -
dhw,
2010-01-29, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-28, 17:07
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-27, 14:59
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-01-23, 19:28
- Back to irreducible complexity -
xeno6696,
2010-02-16, 11:43
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-16, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 14:50
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-18, 05:56
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 19:13
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-18, 05:56
- Back to irreducible complexity -
xeno6696,
2010-02-17, 14:50
- Back to irreducible complexity -
David Turell,
2010-02-16, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity -
xeno6696,
2010-01-23, 17:17