REVISE THIS:Two sides of the irreducible complexity argument (Introduction)

by David Turell , Thursday, September 17, 2009, 18:29 (5545 days ago) @ xeno6696

In Behe's case his algebraic error results in an error of 65 orders of magnitude; it makes his own result less likely. It was on his argument about bacterial flagellum, and it was the key equation of the whole book. Since "Darwin's Black Box" has been in print, this errata has been presented to him in numerous extrememly public events such as college campus debates. He has yet to fix the error. Scientists--when doing their job properly--fix errors when they are brought to their attention. Behe doesn't, therefore he's not a scientist. -Where is this 10^65 error? It is not in Darwin's Black Box in the flagellum section nor any other page I can find.