The real discussion: Values (Humans)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Monday, December 28, 2015, 04:37 (3252 days ago) @ romansh

I assume a materialist world, primarily because I have no evidence of a dualistic existence. In this materialist world my thoughts which include any faith, belief or knowledge I may profess, seem to be an arrangement of fundamental particles and fields ... whatever.
> 
> So these things ultimately are a pattern that for various reasons are not susceptible to change.
> 
> just a starter.-We are in a similar boat. The materialist world is the only game in play. In epistemology, any other description of reality is necessarily bereft. Logically consistent--perhaps. But in regards to being the police of what is *actual* knowledge, as opposed to speculation, materialism for me has no legitimate competitor.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum