What makes life vital (Introduction)

by romansh , Sunday, September 27, 2015, 16:45 (3344 days ago) @ David Turell

Then used electrophoresis:-Are you suggesting the phenomena of electrophoresis did not exist about 4 billion years ago? If you are that would be vey foolish of you, David. Now there are other phenomena that might "select" unintelligently. This argument is like saying self sustaining nuclear fission reactors exist today on Earth because of intelligent design, they could not possibly have existed 1.8 billion years ago on Earth because of chance.
 
> You left this out purposefully. Was such an apparatus present 3.6 billion years ago?
I left the link for people to evaluate the context for themselves.
Oklo - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor
 
> Conclusion for wishful thinking atheists: What is described is intelligent design in laboratories, nothing more. Where do all the nucleotides and polymerizing enzymes on early Earth come from? And so far from the lab research done to date, no ribozyme developed in a lab can reproduce with the accuracy of life on Earth today. and without that accuracy there is no life!-My personal conclusion is that intelligent design theists don't really understand the issues surrounding chance and selection.-They conflate chance and random and see selection being impossible without a designer. I will admit disbelievers don't help by using random and chance interchangeably.