Current science; fraudulent thinking (Introduction)
> dhw: Of course time as we know it exists in this universe. But you insist that time itself began with this universe, while you simultaneously insist that something preceded this universe. (The contradiction is not resolved by juggling with the word “timeless”, which can mean independent of time or unaffected by time.) If the universe came from something, that something must have existed BEFORE the universe, and my concept of time is a movement from before to now to after. What is your concept of time?-We are back to the same discussion as before. I believe in an uncaused first cause. The time we experience is in this universe. We have not and probably cannot imagine 'before' this universe. But if there is a first cause there is a 'before'. We experience time in this universe as a series of sequential events.
Complete thread:
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-11, 23:37
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-12, 09:06
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
GateKeeper,
2015-06-07, 01:12
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-06-07, 04:47
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
GateKeeper,
2015-06-07, 14:12
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-06-07, 14:44
- Current science; poor planning, poor analysis, etc. - David Turell, 2015-06-10, 14:59
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-12-13, 23:30
- Current science; confirmation bias - David Turell, 2019-03-07, 01:06
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-06-07, 14:44
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
GateKeeper,
2015-06-07, 14:12
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-06-07, 04:47
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
GateKeeper,
2015-06-07, 01:12
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-12, 22:47
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-13, 01:18
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-14, 13:51
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-14, 14:27
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-15, 22:38
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-15, 23:44
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-17, 12:19
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-17, 19:33
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-18, 22:34
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-19, 00:53
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-20, 19:18
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-20, 20:01
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-22, 08:30
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-22, 21:58
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-23, 11:38
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-23, 14:41
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-23, 17:24
- Current science; fraudulent thinking - David Turell, 2015-05-23, 17:34
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-23, 17:24
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-23, 14:41
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-24, 17:44
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-24, 19:06
- Current science; lack of blinding -
David Turell,
2015-05-27, 17:48
- Current science; Lancet editor comments -
David Turell,
2015-05-29, 19:13
- Current science; Lancet editor comments -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-30, 13:57
- Current science; a statistically correct fraud - David Turell, 2015-06-01, 14:21
- Current science; Lancet editor comments -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-30, 13:57
- Current science; Lancet editor comments -
David Turell,
2015-05-29, 19:13
- Current science; lack of blinding -
David Turell,
2015-05-27, 17:48
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-24, 19:06
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-23, 11:38
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-22, 21:58
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-22, 08:30
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-20, 20:01
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-20, 19:18
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-19, 00:53
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-18, 22:34
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-17, 19:33
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-17, 12:19
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-15, 23:44
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-15, 22:38
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-14, 14:27
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-14, 01:08
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-15, 12:38
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-21, 00:32
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-22, 11:04
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-22, 15:33
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-23, 12:46
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-23, 16:12
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-24, 12:04
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-24, 18:58
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
David Turell,
2019-02-23, 19:27
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
dhw,
2019-02-24, 09:44
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
David Turell,
2019-02-24, 15:01
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
David Turell,
2019-03-19, 22:28
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations - David Turell, 2021-08-23, 14:35
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
David Turell,
2019-03-19, 22:28
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
David Turell,
2019-02-24, 15:01
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
dhw,
2019-02-24, 09:44
- Current science; overenthusiastic interpretations -
David Turell,
2019-02-23, 19:27
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-24, 18:58
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-24, 12:04
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-23, 16:12
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-23, 12:46
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-22, 15:33
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-22, 11:04
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
David Turell,
2017-12-21, 00:32
- Current science; fallacious thinking -
dhw,
2017-12-15, 12:38
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
dhw,
2015-05-14, 13:51
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
David Turell,
2015-05-13, 01:18
- Current science; fraudulent thinking -
Balance_Maintained,
2015-05-12, 09:06