Negative atheism? (Introduction)

by David Turell , Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 14:58 (3629 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained


> 
> Tony: I think the issue is in how the questions are framed. 
> 
> A theist can examine purely how something was done and believe that God chose to do it that way regardless of the results. 
> 
> An Agnostic can believe or disbelieve whatever they choose, and the question of whether or not there is a God is of little importance.
> 
> An Atheist, however, has to disprove the existence of God AND prove that everything had to be possible WITHOUT God. 
> 
> Atheist, by definition, have to prove a negative.-Welcome back! Well thought out. Atheists choose to not have an explanation and rely on contingency and chance as reasonable causation. That non sequitor makes no sense to me.