Dawkins dissed again and again (Introduction)

by David Turell , Friday, April 25, 2014, 22:21 (3865 days ago) @ romansh

Starting as a soft agnostic, what makes sense to me is where I arived, and what you have witnessed in what I write. You may call it incredulity, but for me it is a logical conclusion. My logic training is only medical, a practical solutions level, which I am sure has conditioned me. Religions' conclusions are men's wishes.
> 
> Romansh:You appear to agree with me (at least in a sense) here.-Yes, I do
> 
> Romansh: Here is a visual map I called belief bubbles ... as to how we might divvy up atheism, theism and agnosticism.-I think it is a pretty good bubble map. I fairly firmly accept the proposition that a greater power exists. Not religions' concept of a personal/ personalized God, but my own quantum level universal consciousness. What I have done is look at all the evidence I can find and understand ( I can't do the theoretical math, but I'll read the conslusions), and I won't accept wild theories that cannot ever be proven. I then came up with sn explanation for me taht I find emotionally comfortable.