Dawkins dissed again and again (Introduction)

by David Turell @, Friday, April 25, 2014, 16:01 (3625 days ago) @ romansh

Romansh: David's panentheistic god ... does not make sense to me either. Frankly I don't trust David's interpretation of probabilities and his ultimate arguement from incredulity. 
> regarding
> some kind of unknown universal intelligence and a purely impersonal, unconscious mass of mindless energy and matter-Starting as a soft agnostic, what makes sense to me is where I arived, and what you have witnessed in what I write. You may call it incredulity, but forme itis a logical conclusion. Muy logic rtaining is only medical, a practical solutions level, which I am sure has conditioned me. Religions' conclusions are men's wishes.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum