Dawkins dissed again and again (Introduction)

by romansh ⌂ @, Friday, April 25, 2014, 20:28 (3865 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by unknown, Friday, April 25, 2014, 21:07

Starting as a soft agnostic, what makes sense to me is where I arived, and what you have witnessed in what I write. You may call it incredulity, but forme itis a logical conclusion. Muy logic rtaining is only medical, a practical solutions level, which I am sure has conditioned me. Religions' conclusions are men's wishes.-You appear to agree with me (at least in a sense) here.-Here is a visual map I called belief bubbles ... as to how we might divvy up atheism, theism and agnosticism.-did it a while ago ... was not completely happy with it then as I am not now.-This model is almost certainly wrong but it might be useful.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum