The issue of chance... (My own introduction) (Evolution)

by Matt S. , Thursday, June 04, 2009, 21:24 (5449 days ago) @ David Turell

If you want refutations of Behe's arguments, talkorigins is probably the best place to start. It's run by scientists--people who actually do the research into evolution. - http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe.html - Their refutations of Behe are incredibly thorough and they cite every source and theory to a fault, his arguments are defeated on his science alone. - Other bits of evidence is his typical response to someone challenging his hypothesis (ID is not a theory, refer to scientific method) is not on substantive grounds, but typically Behe launches into Ad Hominem. When a scientist's idea is challenged he either drops it or adapts it... not Behe... not at all. His argument is essentially unchanged over the course of nearly 20 years... - And as for Behe's scientific output:
http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Michael_Behe - Look at the section "What kind of scientist is Michael Behe." There's two excerpts from a paper published by another researcher comparing Behe's scientific output to those of a scientist universally considered as "top-notch." - If you still find Behe trustworthy and compelling... I'm pretty much done on that topic. We'd do better looking into another area.