Ruth & Rindler (General)

by BBella , Thursday, August 08, 2013, 18:02 (4123 days ago) @ dhw

bbella: If our physical reality actually emanates from the QR, which I suspect is so, I would think the QR is more real than our physical reality (if there is any qualitative differences, which I suspect there isn't). It is more that our perspective is limited by our sight and mind.[/i]
 
> I find David's dialysis image extremely helpful. -I understand dialysis, but can't understand the connection to Quantum Reality and Layers, unless you saying what we see (the physical) is what slips through the QL, but what we do not see is what does not? ->Maybe we just don't need the confusing term "separation", though. It could be argued that ALL entities are separate. We only get to know "bits and pieces" of whatever we perceive ... from inanimate objects to live people. I would suggest that quantum reality is less manifest, less accessible, less definable than our everyday reality, but not "more real" and not "separate".-I completely agree about not needing the term "separation" which is why I wrote in parenthesis "if there is any qualitative difference, which I suspect there isn't" and why I brought up this subject of separation in the first place. Although it's a poor analysis, I used the cells within the body and the body to express that thought. Both the cells and the body are physical yet one seems less physical than the other because we need magnifying instruments to catch a glimpse of them. But in truth, they are both one reality. For definitive purposes we might call one "perceptible" reality and the other "imperceptible" reality, but there is really no difference in either realities but that one is perceptible to the human eye and mind while the other is not.