Ruth & Rindler (General)

by David Turell @, Thursday, August 08, 2013, 15:36 (3920 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: [...] the answer to your problem is contained in the discussion and in the mathematician's comment I just reproduced.(2013-08-07, 15:02) Quanta exist, but are undescribable in their totality with our current senses. Therefore, we can only nibble at thier properties, eventually see all of the reality one bite at a time. Most of the incongruities are obviated by Ruth's approach. They are all interconnected and reacting together at random in their on realm.
> 
> dhw: This is clear, thank you. But these generalizations don't cover the specific questions I asked in my Rindler post of 3 August at 11.43. For instance, the fact that we can only see reality 'one bite at a time' does not explain to me how the problem of dependence on the observer to identify the properties and even the existence of quanta "evaporates", because in both cases "a transaction occurs" which is "simply interpreted differently by the different observers".-Part of this is Ruth investigating a relativistic view of quantum theory. No two viewers ever 'see' quanta the same way. I wish Ruth would step in to explain. The Rindler quanta are views with motion and position involved.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum