Thomas Kuhn revisited; for Matt especially (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, November 29, 2011, 21:47 (4721 days ago) @ David Turell

http://www.youtube.com/user/potholer54#p/c/A4F0994AFB057BB8/5/7nnVQ2fROOg
http://www.youtube.com/user/potholer54#p/c/A4F0994AFB057BB8/6/uXesBhYwdRo

^^^I would like your thoughts on this.

[EDIT]

This (and all the other videos) are from a journalist who has been working on climate science for 20 years.

Here is another view from the wsj:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203935604577066183761315576.html?KEYWORDS...

your guy is gullible, and I don't know why.

If you watched the entire 20min, I don't think he's gullible at all. In fact, the only judgment he makes in both videos are on the political pundits. (Idiots like Limbaugh and Inhofe.) He makes reference to other climate skeptics that have appeared in the peer reviewed literature, and addresses their points. I don't buy the conspiracy theory.

But about the discussion about those fraudulent emails, he explains everything surrounding them and on why those two emails (touted by some of the same experts mentioned above) don't suggest a mass conspiracy.

If you watched the 20 minutes, you would also know that one of the two emailers was criticizing Mann's data back in '98. Where's the conspiracy, David?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"