Kent Hovind vs. a Molecular Biologist (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Monday, July 04, 2011, 03:44 (4890 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Sorry I have been gone so long. Between school, work, and utter madness and chaos at home I have barely had time to catch my breath. 
> 
> My point is that we are making a lot of assumptions starting from a point of arrogance. Regardless of what turns out to be the truth, the truth is unknowable when you start out thinking you already know it. The whole 'you can't fill a glass that is already full' gag.-I fully understand! -I think you (at least for me) are putting some words into my mouth. Addressing your point directly, if the overall picture of life is simple to complex...-Basically the short of it is, that David's argument for a creator fits the given evidence better than the idea of starting "perfect" and then deteriorating.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum