The Sermon Part 2 (Agnosticism)

by David Turell , Saturday, August 02, 2008, 16:52 (5955 days ago) @ George Jelliss

But David has made clear in other threads that he is prepared to accept anecdotal evidence (such as of near death experiences), and also to rely upon evidence presented by people like the Discovery Institute who have a clear creationist agenda and are pariahs of the peer-reviewed scientific community. Thus despite his claims, his standards of "objectivity" are not scientifically adequate. - I need to make one further reply to George. I have met and talked with Michael Behe of "Darwin's Black Box" fame or infamy as you view him. He is a full professor of biochemistry at Lehigh U. in Philadelphia, and as such is fully peer-reviewed in his scientific papers. It is his considered scientific opinion that is Darwin is wrong, after judging the evidence he weighed. Scientific knowledge is not a majority wins situation. Read Kuhn.