An ideal ultimate truth? (Origins)

by David Turell , Saturday, May 08, 2010, 20:32 (5311 days ago) @ xeno6696


> The uncertainty principle isn't a "wall." It's "real" statement is mathematically dense, but it says that you can't know both the position and the velocity of a quantum object to an arbitrary precision. How you can possibly rationalize a basis of consciousness from this mathematical law means that you *must* be making an overarching series of generalizations divorced from the actual meaning of the theorem. At the level of how chemical actions occur (our brain) we aren't dealing with quantum phenomenon in the sense I've described in quantum computing. They're alot more predictable. Heisenberg's only action here is in determining positions of electrons. 
> 
> > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627596.200-quantum-wonders-the-hamlet-effect.ht... But why not refer to the whole ball of weirdness wax:-http://www.newscientist.com/special/seven-wonders-of-the-quantum-world