Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution (Origins)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, March 07, 2010, 22:03 (5373 days ago) @ David Turell

Right off the bat, the paper starts discussing multiverses, a concept that at present is purely hypothesis itself. (And you would need to tell me which versions of String Theory--there are several!) -"In this model, the stage for Darwinian selection is set by anthropic selection of complex systems that rarely but inevitably emerge by chance in the infinite universe (multiverse)."-This line from the hypothesis is similar to my previous claim that life was inevitable for our universe. So far, this seems like observing that the sun radiates light. I still need to dive into the meat of the paper. Which I promise to do first day of spring break (next saturday) and give a more detailed response.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"