Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution (Origins)

by David Turell , Wednesday, February 24, 2010, 01:36 (5385 days ago) @ xeno6696

David,
> 
> Specifically the article is refuting the p of .00015 (ish) that I know you've referenced before. THAT is the weapon it takes away from you. You can no longer use it. -I don't know where or when I used a p value of any magnitude
> 
> In either case, my overall point is that we can't trust statistical arguments for systems we don't completely understand.-But IF we understand, we can use them. Tell what is not understood.