The Problem with Behe (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, December 08, 2009, 22:05 (5463 days ago) @ George Jelliss


> I agree with xeno/Matt's view about Behe, but I think it's all been said here before. He can't be compared with Stenger.-My recent reply, as this note was being entered, covers Stenger. Note the philosopher of physics agrees with me, and I'm not a Ph.D. in physics, but its equivalent in medicine, which doesn't give me a tremendous knowledge in physics.

Post reply

3086 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-04, 01:31
- The Problem with Stenger - George Jelliss, 2009-12-04, 17:21
  - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-05, 00:51
    - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-05, 14:37
      - The Problem with Henninger - George Jelliss, 2009-12-05, 20:07
        The Problem with Henninger - David Turell, 2009-12-06, 00:17
        The Problem with Henninger - George Jelliss, 2009-12-07, 12:48
        The Problem with Henninger - David Turell, 2009-12-07, 14:13
    - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2011-06-24, 03:21
      - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2011-06-25, 02:44
        The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2011-07-01, 01:59
- The Problem with Stenger - xeno6696, 2009-12-07, 02:13
  - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-07, 14:18
    - The Problem with Stenger - xeno6696, 2009-12-08, 14:53
      - The Problem with Behe - George Jelliss, 2009-12-08, 21:40
        The Problem with Behe - David Turell, 2009-12-08, 22:05
        
        The Problem with Behe - xeno6696, 2009-12-09, 18:36

AgnosticWeb.com

The Problem with Behe (Introduction)