The Problem with Henninger (Introduction)

by David Turell , Monday, December 07, 2009, 14:13 (5464 days ago) @ George Jelliss

DT writes: "Climategate is actually a huge issue"
> 
> No it isn't, its an artificial storm blown up by hacks like Henninger. 
> Here is the real science:
> 
> Royal Society Climate Science Statement
> http://royalsociety.org/Climate-Science-Statement/
> 
> Why there's no sign of a climate conspiracy in hacked emails
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18238-why-theres-no-sign-of-a-climate-conspiracy-... 
> Earth more sensitive to carbon dioxide than previously thought
> http://www.physorg.com/news179328817.html-This are not real science journals. All of these sources are in bed with the climate change crowd. How to you explain the fact that Michael Mann was made to admit he made mistakes with his 'hockey stick' graph, the famous one the IPCC used to spread the alarm. Science is not a democratuic vote; it is based on proven facts created by careful science. His graph got rid of the medieval warm period. I guess Greenland was never green. Why have temperatures been flat to down since 1998 and Co2 up 2 ppm in the same period, if it is the most direct cause? -We are off point for this forum. My issue is still we have to be able to trust science to do our own thinking and conclusions. Remember the PR flurry over IDA? There is too much money in government science grants today which allows politcal agendas to creep in. Healthy skepticism is to be preferred over blind acceptance of questionable material. Especially when nations' economies are at stake.