The Problem with Behe (Introduction)

by George Jelliss , Crewe, Tuesday, December 08, 2009, 21:40 (5463 days ago) @ xeno6696

This part of the thread seems to have metamorphosed to be about Behe rather than Stenger! -I don't quote Stenger blindly as DT claims. I quote him carefully because I don't want to misrepresent his views, and the terms he uses are technical. I have been forced to quote him at greater length in order to reply to Mark in the "Nothing" thread. -I agree with xeno/Matt's view about Behe, but I think it's all been said here before. He can't be compared with Stenger.

--
GPJ

Post reply

3112 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-04, 01:31
- The Problem with Stenger - George Jelliss, 2009-12-04, 17:21
  - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-05, 00:51
    - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-05, 14:37
      - The Problem with Henninger - George Jelliss, 2009-12-05, 20:07
        The Problem with Henninger - David Turell, 2009-12-06, 00:17
        The Problem with Henninger - George Jelliss, 2009-12-07, 12:48
        The Problem with Henninger - David Turell, 2009-12-07, 14:13
    - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2011-06-24, 03:21
      - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2011-06-25, 02:44
        The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2011-07-01, 01:59
- The Problem with Stenger - xeno6696, 2009-12-07, 02:13
  - The Problem with Stenger - David Turell, 2009-12-07, 14:18
    - The Problem with Stenger - xeno6696, 2009-12-08, 14:53
      - The Problem with Behe - George Jelliss, 2009-12-08, 21:40
        The Problem with Behe - David Turell, 2009-12-08, 22:05
        
        The Problem with Behe - xeno6696, 2009-12-09, 18:36

AgnosticWeb.com

The Problem with Behe (Introduction)