Book review of Nature\'s I.Q. (Evolution)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 20:09 (5366 days ago) @ David Turell

Dr. Turell, - > I have reviewed these references and I&apos;ve read both of Robrt Wright&apos;s books, Non-Zero and The Moral Animal, and E.O. Wilson&apos;s On Human Nature and I am still of the same mind. We humans are different in kind, and to apply human cooperation to animals and plants is stretching credulity beyond its bounds. They can&apos;t think like we do and they cannot imagine altruism. I must conclude, if mutations are random and generally deleterious, with a series of lucky contingencies, these symbiotic relationships are miraculous. - My education did not teach that most mutations are deleterious. It taught that only the deleterious ones never pass on. Most mutations are point mutations where one letter of a codon results in sometimes a subtly altered protein, sometimes not altered at all; therefore *only* if the mutation is deleterious will it cease to exist. You seem to think the opposite with your statement - >if mutations are random and generally deleterious, with a series of lucky contingencies, these symbiotic relationships are miraculous.< - From what I&apos;ve learned, mutations are not generally deleterious. Mutations are fine more often than not.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"