How math interprets biology and life, and the cosmos (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, December 15, 2013, 14:44 (3996 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

David: That is not the intent of my statements. "Mechanical action" is driven by intelligent information in the genome. It makes the cells seem intelligent of their own volition, but they use implanted information from an intelligent source.
> > 
> > Matt: How can you say that with conviction when we don't even know what the DNA of the first organisms really look like? I'm all for challenging Dawkins, but with the exception of abiogenesis, we have a pretty clear picture of the life of biology, and the picture painted is from incredibly simple to incredibly complex. And I still have never seen anything that suggests that the genome is informed by any source other than the external environment, evolution and epigenetics included.
> 
> 
> Ummm....if we have such a clear picture than why are scientist constantly surprised by their discoveries? (Read: Why don't their new discoveries don't fit with their 'pretty clear -
You'll have to give me a more specific case. I haven't seen any earth-shattering science from biology lately unless we're talking GMO, or the company proposing to put firefly genes into plant leaves to reduce our reliance on electric light.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"