Zero Point Field (The nature of a \'Creator\')

by BBella , Saturday, February 16, 2013, 22:17 (4296 days ago) @ dhw

BBELLA: A quote from: http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_akashic1.htm
> 
> Mystics and sages have long maintained that there exists an interconnecting cosmic field at the roots of reality that conserves and conveys information, a field known as the Akashic record. Recent discoveries in the new field of vacuum physics now show that this Akashic field is real and has its equivalent in the zero-point field that underlies space itself. This field consists of a subtle sea of fluctuating energies from which all things arise: atoms and galaxies, stars and planets, living beings, and even consciousness. This zero-point Akashic-field--or "A-field"-- is not only the original source of all things that arise in time and space; it is also the constant and enduring memory of the universe. It holds the record of all that ever happened in life, on Earth, and in the cosmos and relates it to all that is yet to happen.
> 
>...We could call it the mind of God or the source, it doesn't really matter what it's called, as long as we know it is the source of All That Is...agreed?[/i]
> 
> I've had another look at this, and I expect even atheists would agree that some form of "fluctuating energies" is the source of All That Is. But I think it does matter what we call it, because every name has associations...The moment we delve, we're entangled in a web of ideas associated with the terms used to describe the field.-Yes, you are right. It does matter what we "choose" to call it since usually we call it what we believe it to be, which holds energetic associations with it. It is for this very reason I do my level best not to "delve" too deep into others ideas and associations of what this source is - other than on a cold scientific level, and even that is ever evolving with no real concrete. I allow room for evolution about just what it is. I may skim, skirt, skip or consider thoughts and ideas about it, but all in all, I know my perspective is mine alone, altho in an ever evolving state of transition - not just about what it is, but also what I want or hope this source to be. -So, yes, we all look at this source thru our own (separate for the most part) perspective lenses. Is there one "Truth" about what is there? Or is this source so malleable it is what each of us believe it to be? Maybe this source accommodates each, or possibly even a collective perspective? Maybe it is no more than creation (a verb not a noun) itself? It could be that malleable. Just to consider that thought, for me, is tantalizing. Whatever "it" is, we are. We do not peer into it, we peer from it - we are peers together, entwined (in-twined), yet consciously choosing to be separate for this very reason - to be autonomous.