Building a flagellum (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 01:26 (4331 days ago) @ David Turell

http://youtu.be/Ey7Emmddf7Y
> > > 
> > 
> > It's only fair to post the common rebuttal. c'mon David, teach the controversy! 
> > 
> > http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DK_HVrjKcvrU&v=K_HVrjKcvrU&a... 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Are you amazed?
> 
> How do you watch that site? It won't open for me.-Got the site open. I've seen Miller before do this. He is talking beside the point. Behe's point is not that the molecules were functional/not functional before, but that the original function was entirely unrelated to the final product. Each of the 40 types of molecule had to be individually readapted and coordinated to work together. How is that done step by step without implying design and purpose? Miller skips the improbability of the role reaching a final organization by a process with no purpose. What is also fascinating is the covergence of bacterial and archaeal flagelli, with both types having different genes, and therefore not homologous. But they function the same.-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC95564/ -Simon Conway Morris has a whole book on the subject of convergence implying design and purpose, Life's Solution-Miller loves being a shill for Darwin. He's making money at it. He keeps talking about Dover. One judge's decision is one judge's decision, proof of nothing. Read James Barham's columns:-http://www.thebestschools.org/bestschoolsblog/2012/06/12/darwin-v-life-emergence/-He is an atheist.