Backwards retina (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Saturday, May 21, 2011, 05:05 (4724 days ago) @ David Turell

I feel your appraisal is unintentionally misleading; the main objection from atheists is in asking the question "Why flip the image and then force the brain to flip it back?"
> 
> The experiement has been done that using lenses on a subject to make everything upside down, he soon has his brain flip things right side up. In pediatrics they teach that the newborn sees upside down and quickly learns the right way.
> > 
> > This article talks about a completely different point altogether. It's talking about an underlying mechanism that would be unaffected by transmitting the image the "right" way in the first place. Or, in another way, the mechanism discussed doesn't address the argument posited by atheists at all.
> 
> The article is only making the point that the retina is masterfully designed. It has to be backwards to increase energy delivery efficiency, and then these corrective measures are added.-David, correct me.-I just reread the article, and not once did I see a reference that suggested that an image MUST be processed in reverse in order to achieve the desired effect...?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"