Language and Reality (Humans)
> One example of a simple but near useless boundary (unless agreed upon) might be an agreement of that which can be touched and that which can't be. Or that which can be seen by the eye (including microscope) and that which can't be, etc. Other than boundaries agreed upon like this, it would seem to me discussion's about reality and language can go nowhere but round and round. > > Just a thought.-Thank you, BB. My mind can picture nothingness, even if nothing is there to see. I also can imagine 'something', whether it is there to see or not. Let the merry-go-round begin. The something/nothing question is perfectly reasonable at a mental level.
Complete thread:
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-04, 12:48
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-04, 18:34
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-04, 22:34
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-05, 00:36
- Language and Reality - dhw, 2011-04-05, 11:33
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-05, 11:34
- Language and Reality - David Turell, 2011-04-05, 15:07
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-05, 20:03
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-07, 13:54
- Language and Reality -
BBella,
2011-04-07, 21:12
- Language and Reality - David Turell, 2011-04-07, 21:58
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-09, 13:36
- Language and Reality - dhw, 2011-04-13, 10:57
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-16, 21:52
- Language and Reality - David Turell, 2011-04-16, 22:54
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-25, 14:23
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-28, 00:39
- Language and Reality - dhw, 2011-04-29, 11:13
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-28, 00:39
- Language and Reality -
BBella,
2011-04-07, 21:12
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-07, 13:54
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-05, 00:36
- Language and Reality -
dhw,
2011-04-04, 22:34
- Language and Reality -
Balance_Maintained,
2011-04-04, 18:34