The Electric Universe (Evolution)

by David Turell , Monday, March 14, 2011, 16:59 (5001 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

I am definitely not an expert in Cosmology. I have trouble with analyzing details of complex systems in strict logical forms like mathematics. My understanding of things like that is more intuitive. I understand what they are saying, and I understand the relationships and see the patterns. When something is out of place it sticks out like a sore thumb to me. I can't look at the BBT without going cross-eyed because of all the things that stand out as wrong. I am at a loss as to how to explain it mathematically, though. 
> 
> EU resonates deeply with me, and while I make no claim that the theory is perfect, there are far fewer sore thumbs.-Thank you for your discussion of your analysis of yourself, as I analyze myself. I have taken the time to look at Thunderbolts and the other site. Thunderbolts contains many statements about mainline scientists reactions to new findings which are not referenced. The whole thing reads like a polemicized hoax, based on what I had previously learned. So I took your challenge, and dug into the internet. -Thornhill never completed his training. I've met dropouts like him in the medical field. They usually think they are smarter than their professors. He may not be like that, I don't know. -The Electric Universe ideas stem from Velikovsky joined later by Talbott who studied the myths that V studied. These studies contain some real confusion according tothis site:
http://www.native-science.net/Mythology.Light_White_Right.htm-This Skeptic article tears the EU concept apart:
http://www.skepdic.com/velikov.html-Note the quote from Ellenberger, a young student of Velikovsky.-
A good review of Velikovsky. He and I are similar in that we both were/are Jewish physicians, but he was a psychiatrist. From studies of budding medical students it has been shown that potential psychiatrists have many doubts abourt their own personality structures. V. was depressed in later life: -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky-A discussion of mistaken statements on Thunderbolt about 'Deep Impact' comet results:-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-02-11_Electric_Universe_Concept,_NPOV_clarification-Critique of the book "Electric Sky': Explains the misuse of Alfv'in's theories-http://homepage.mac.com/cygnusx1/anomalies/ElectricSky_20080322.pdf-Thompson takes apart Thornhill with many references:-http://www.tim-thompson.com/grey-areas.html-Discussion of quantized redshifts as an answer to Thornhill:-http://homepage.mac.com/cygnusx1/anomalies/quantizedz.html-Explaining why Halton Arp is wrong:-http://homepage.mac.com/cygnusx1/anomalies/discordantz.html