Further Treatises on Time... (Humans)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Friday, March 11, 2011, 22:58 (4802 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Balance,
> > > I agree, by the way, that time as a 'thing' is non-existent, but it is a useful tool.
> > 
> > And here you get it... what gives?
> > 
> > You're missing some context, but my overall point was that time is only a snapshot of states, not a discretely 'real' thing.
> 
> I didn't miss the point at all, I was merely pointing that that even though time is not "real", without it, all we would have is chaos because the human mind is not equipped to live in a "timeless" state. We all need our little delusions, they make life more interesting.-I would disagree with "equipped." I don't know if I had mentioned this to you, but I had spent about 6 years practicing Zen, quit for 3 years, and have picked it back up again. -Our mind is certainly "equipped" to be in a timeless state, but it requires a great deal of concentration. -It's not natural or intuitive, by any stretch, and if this is what you meant I accept that. -I was never challenging time being useful; only pointing out that it isn't a 'real' thing even though intuitively it is very real. -One of the most wonderful things is when meditating and you can sync your mind with the 'timelessness.'

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum